Phase II (2019-'21) |
---|
II P1: FIRE Induced Element Cycling II P2: Nutrient cycling & vegetation II P3: Microorganisms & soil structure II P4: Linking bioturbation with fluxes II P5: Erosion-Climate-Vegetation coupling (SECCO) II P6: Bio-Geomorphology II P7: Biota, fracture, thresholds II P8: Stress constrained landscape modeling II P9: Bridging timescales with modeling II P10: Landscape evolution from Thermochronology II P11: DeepES - Weathering Geochemistry II P12: DeepES - Microbial element cycling II P13: DeepES - Geophysical Imaging II P14: DeepES - Microbial activity II P15: DeepES - Geomicrobiology II A1: Plant available water storage II A2: Bioweath |
Phase I (2016-'18) |
---|
I P1: Plant Traits and Decomposition I P2: Coupled Modelling I P3: Biofilms & Weathering I P4: Sediment storage & Connectivity I P5: Crustweathering I P6: Root Carbon I P7: Paleoclimate I P8: Imaging of Weathering front I P9: Sediment Transport I P10: Phosphorus solubilization I P11: Green & Grey world I P12: Biogenic Weathering I P13: Microbiological Stabilization I A3: Carbon & Nutrient Fluxes |
Investigator Names and Contact Info:
Chilean Collaborators Involved:
PhD:
66% Co-Supervisor: PD Dr. Thomas Hoffmann, 33% Co-supervisor: Prof. Lothar Schrott
BSc:
Supervisor: Prof. Lothar Schrott, Co-supervisor: PD Dr. Thomas Hoffmann
Fieldwork Assistant:
Supervisor: Dr. Jana Eichel
Project summary:
This proposal is a continuation of our work conducted in EarthShape phase 1. In phase 1, we quantified how climate and vegetation affected the long-term geomorphic conditions of the four EarthShape study areas. Therefore we focused on source to sink sediment connectivity along the flow path of water and sediment in river catchments. We state that biotic effects on sediment routing are scale dependent: on short (biotic) time scales, vegetation disconnects flow path, while on long (geologic) time scales vegetation increases connectivity through biotic weathering.
Table 1: Vegetation-modulated transport conditions on hillslopes and channels in arid and humid catchments.
Climate | Vegetation cover / biotic weathering | Dominant grain size | Transport conditions | Sediment residence time | ||
Hillslope | Channel | Hillslope | Channel | |||
Arid | low | coarse | Weathering limited | Transport limited | short | long |
humid | high | fine | Transport limited | Supply limited | long | short |
In phase 1, we focused the analysis on the long time scales and achieved detailed geomorphic maps of the study sites, used geophysical soundings to estimate the thickness of sediment deposits and investigated the grain size distributions of the soils and sediment along the flow path from eroding hillslopes to the channel outlet. We found significant differences of the spatial configuration of geomorphic process domains and the related transport conditions in the four study sites that can be linked to specific grain size distributions that are modulated by the climatic and biotic conditions within the study areas (compare table 1). These results motivated us to gain a more detailed process understanding on the biogeomorphic feedbacks in the study sites. We do this by:
1. Improving the representation of vegetation in sediment transport modelling through vegetation surveys, mapping and assessment of the 3D vegetation structure.
2. Quantifying contemporary sediment dynamics (erosion and deposition) at selected sites in the EarthShape catchments, using repeated drone surveys and structure from motion photogrammetry
3. Modelling contemporary and catchment-integrated sediment budgets of the four ES-sites and quantify biotic influences on hillslope erosion and sediment deposition using the model Erosion3D at the catchment.
4. Finalizing work from the first phase and derive long-term sediment budgets
5. Identifying and comparing biogeomorphic feedbacks along a climatic gradient at short and long timescales and integrating results using hierarchical biogeomorphic concepts